Suppose a compliance platform cost $12,000 annually. Does that sound like a lot?
The answer will depend on the product it replaces.
If $12,000 is used to cut down on hundreds of hours in repetitive evidence gathering across an intricate technological landscape that could be that is well-invested. If a small business of seven people could gather the same data manually in a few hours every month, the total is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Identifying the platform with the best features is not the only thing to consider. Ask how many hours and time these features could save your business.
The Break-Even Point of Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The value of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a growing technology company with hundreds of employees, numerous cloud environments, a variety of applications, and frequently access changes. The strain of manually gathering evidence constantly could be extremely heavy. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence could easily justify the cost.
Now think about a 10-person company making preparations for its first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
This is a crucial distinction in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. A high-end platform can offer significant capabilities, however those capabilities can only provide financial value when the company actually needs these capabilities.
Compare Architecture, Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta or Drata could quickly turn into a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the features, services as well as the quotes and contracts of both platforms. Both are reputable compliance platforms that focus on automation and integrations.
You’ll need to decide on something else first. Do you require a compliance platform that integrates? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors do not all use the same format.
A lot of Vanta competitors are in a similar category that is focused on automation. There are lighter platforms that focus on organization over large system connectivity.
CertAssist falls into the latter category. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, provides editable policy and evidence guidance, and allows auditors to review evidence submitted with read-only access.
It doesn’t connect to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose their evidence that they want to present.
The system access should be considered. the system access.
Eliminating integrations has a distinct disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence by hand.
This removes the requirement to integrate and the implementation of compliance does not require an integration with the operational environment.
The structures of one are not superior to each other. Which one is appropriate for your company?
CertAssist targets teams that comprise between five and 200 people and gives pricing information rather than having to have a sales conversation. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 monthly, as opposed to a regular $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees are not necessarily identical to those of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
Compliance can be managed with the use of a simple platform. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence multiply, the economics can ultimately favor more automation. This is a much better approach to invest in compliance technology to let complexity earn its rightful place.
Spending money on fifty integrations just because they look great in a comparison table isn’t worth it. They’re worth it when doing the tasks they replace is more expensive as compared to manually performing them.